top of page

Pulling Back the Curtain on the Theatre of Faith

  • Terry Wigmore
  • Jun 6
  • 5 min read

A Play in 3 Acts

Stepping out from behind a curtain is not for the faint of heart. Rather, it requires a conviction that is greater than the conviction we called faith. For those of us who spent the high-octane decades of late-twentieth-century evangelicalism immersed in an environment of absolute certainty, the world was small, sharply defined, and urgent. Every action carried eternal weight, making every family member, friend, co-worker or neighbour "a field white unto harvest"and the recipient of well-meaning, if not obnoxious and relentless preaching of the Four spiritual Laws. But when you finally step through the exit doors into the quiet, open air of agnosticism, the view changes completely. What once felt like a sacred, urgent duty suddenly looks like an intricate, human-made theater.


It is a deeply disorienting realization, and when the curtain first drops, it is entirely natural to feel a flash of cynical amusement—a quiet smile from the wings of the stage as you see the wires holding up the painted scenery. Yet, the most constructive path forward is not to burn the playhouse down, but to carefully examine the production. When we strip away the grand claims of cosmic authority, we can begin to see religion for what it actually is: a historic operating system, coded during our collective cultural childhood, designed to meet basic human needs in a silent universe.


To understand how this theatre functions, we only need to look at its script or what I call the three acts.

Each Act is its own context, but taken together, all three are a unified effort to pull the theatrical curtain back on preformative faith.


Act I: The Cradle of Antiquity (the science and faith claims)

The first movement of the theater begins at the very dawn of human history, long before the invention of steeples or modern theological systems. We can still glimpse the physical remnants of this opening act hidden deep in the earth, painted across the limestone walls of the Lascaux caves, or carved into the breathtaking, ancient pillars of Göbekli Tepe and Stonehenge. Thousands of years ago, our early ancestors looked out at a universe that felt like a terrifying chaos of unpredictable forces—thunder, disease, seasonal scarcity, and the ultimate mystery of death. Faced with this overwhelming vulnerability, the human mind did what it has always done: it sought patterns and created stories around the campfire to make sense of the wild world.

These ancient paintings and mythologies were humanity's first collective attempts to explain the natural order, a way to give the sunrise a purpose and the storm a face. Alongside these stories came a practical, earthly necessity: the need for tight-knit community survival. Early societies discovered that to endure, they required absolute internal solidarity. To bind the group together, we developed distinct, shared markers: specific rituals, sacred gatherings, and restrictive customs. These were functional, historic tools designed to declare, "We belong to each other, and we look out for one another." It was a deeply human way to find safety in a dangerous world, but it carried an enduring flaw: the very boundaries that created internal comfort automatically drew a line against the outsider, creating an immediate landscape of "us versus them."


Act II: The Particular Theater (Evangelicalism in the 21st century)

Modern faith, from the gospel preaching of late-twentieth-century TV evangelism and the growing dominance of Christian media—Jim and Tammy Bakker, the Hour of Power, Appointment with Destiny, and a host of other American media enterprises emerging in the latter part of the 20th century—to the elaborate liturgical traditions of antiquity, is a direct, particular extension of that historical human framework. It is no better, and no worse; it is merely the same timeless script performed on a more sophisticated stage to an audience that is craving more entertainment (or demonstrations of the power of faith?) than simple proclamations of faith. The ancient tools of community bonding simply received a high-production upgrade in set design, wardrobe and makeup, and new social media outlets.

The mandatory grooming habits, the restrictive veils, and the elaborate robes of modern religion serve the exact same social function as those ancient civilizational markers: they are visible, everyday signs designed to reinforce a shared identity and maintain a protective boundary line. Even the worship sensory apparatus—the swinging incense, the rhythmic chanting, or the swelling synthesizers of a televised worship program—functions as a stylized, time-tested method for emotional regulation. When a modern believer experiences an emotional high or a deep sense of stillness, the script claims a supernatural visitation. In reality, it is our shared human biology quietly managing its own anxieties. The theater has become far more complex and technologically advanced, but the underlying machinery remains beautifully, entirely human.


Act III: The Lever With No Strings Attached

(The Epistemology of Science V Revelation)


The final act requires an honest audit of real-world results. For millennia, humanity operated under the assumption that faith was a cosmic lever—a mechanism by which a group of people could alter the physical laws of nature if they only prayed with enough fervor, fasted with enough discipline, or demonstrated enough institutional loyalty.

But history presents us with a glaring reality: it is a lever with no strings attached. The tangible advancement of human well-being, safety, and health did not arrive via the altar of revelation; it came from the empirical data of the lab.

We did not eradicate smallpox through a sermon; we beat it with a vaccine. Agricultural scarcity was not conquered by fasting, or dancing around a campfire, but by nitrogen fertilizers and crop science. The modern infrastructure that preserves our daily lives—clean municipal water, antibiotics, microprocessors, and the ability to replace failing human organs—was built because human beings had the courage to put down the ancient scripts and look through telescopes and microscopes. Science made 21st-century survival possible, while prayer and fasting remained internal accoutrements, entirely unequipped to alter the physical world.


Exit Music: The Humanist Landing

Recognizing the performative nature of this theater does not mean we must look back at our past with cynicism. We do not need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. It is entirely possible to step out of the audience, refuse to buy a ticket to the illusion, and still appreciate the sheer artistry of the human journey.

We can look at a stunning cathedral, listen to a beautifully composed hymn from our youth, or observe a communal tradition with a gentle, understanding eye. We can see these things as monuments to human creativity and our universal desire for connection.

We are a remarkable species that has traveled from the flickering light of cave paintings to the engineering of the International Space Station. We did not achieve this because a magician was pulling strings from behind a celestial curtain, but because the human mind has an astonishing capacity to learn, to adapt, and to protect its own. We can respect the ancient need for the theater while choosing to stand firmly, gratefully, on the solid ground of reality.

 
 
 

Comments


  • Twitter Clean
  • Facebook Clean
  • White Instagram Icon
  • SoundCloud Clean
bottom of page